Results

    Overall

    Performances of the 30 companies vary widely within each of the thematic areas of the Index. Many companies are performing relatively well in certain areas and leading practices are found even on issues for which performances are generally weak. At the same time, performance levels indicate clear potential for companies to continuously improve their policies and practices on the EESG issues represented in all thematic areas.

    Economic Development

    Business Conduct

    Lifecycle Management

    Community Wellbeing

    Working Conditions

    Environmental Responsibility

    Current Best Practice: Aggregation of best scores for all indicators in the given thematic area.

    The 'Current Best Practice' value represents the aggregation of best scores achieved for all indicators in the given thematic area, taking into account all companies' results.
    The maximum value of 6.0 represents the maximum achievable score.

    Companies achieving the ten best scores for each thematic area

    Economic Development

    Business Conduct

    Lifecycle Management

    Community Wellbeing

    Working Conditions

    Environmental Responsibility

    Responsible Mining Index
    Responsible Mining FOUNDATION

    Copyright notice

    All data and written content are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).

    Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0)

    Users are free to share and adapt the material but must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes were made. The licensed material may not be used for commercial purposes, or in a discriminating, degrading or distorting way. When cited, attribute to: "Responsible Mining Index 2018 (RMI), Responsible Mining Foundation (RMF)." Images, photographs, and video content depicted on RMI and RMF websites are excluded from this license, except where noted.